Saturday, May 7, 2011

PETE NEWELL ON THE PROS/CONS OF A CHANGING DEFENSIVE SYSTEM

In his book “Pete Newell’s Defensive Basketball” Coach Newell explains the positives and negatives of a multiple/changing defense system.


STRENGTHS:
Reading problems for opponent

Particularly effective against inexperiences guards

Impatience in opponents

Confusion it can create for a superior talented opponent

Preparation problems for an opponent

Defensive confidence it can inspire when the opponent becomes confused

Forcing opponet to have to conter each change of defense

Forcing opponent to resort to low-percentage shots when unable to fathom the changes

Turnovers it can create which often result in easy, unopposed baskets

Changing the tempo of the defense

Defensively using the ball-possession clock to its advantage


WEAKNESSES
It is usually more effective in the early part of the schedule than in the important late-season games and post-season tourneys

It can create problems of vision, stnace, responsibility as it changes from the assigned individual defense to a zone-type defense or vice versa

As opponents experience more defenses of this type, their reading and counters become more effective

Being able to go from a soft-type defense to an aggressive denial-type defense as a unit can be difficult

Being able to go from a fot-type defense to an aggressive denial-type defense as a unity can be difficult

This surprise-and-change concept has not produced many Final Four NCAA teams nor high school championship teams as opposed to the simplicity and execution programs.

Breakdowns can occur for a solid, aggressive denial team that relies on peripheral vision and low stance and is mentally perpared for its individual-assigned responsibilities

The fundamental habits that are essential to a particular aspect of the change up defense can be compromised, thereby lessening the effectiveness of this specific phase of the change-up defense